The Urban Dharma Newsletter... April 6, 2004


In This Issue: Yoga and Buddhism

0. Humor/Quotes...
1. Yoga and Buddhism
...by David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri)
2. Hindu Yoga, Buddhist Yoga, Jaina Yoga
...by Georg Feuerstein
3. An Introduction to the Practice of Yoga and Buddhism
...John C. Kimbrough

4. Temple/Center/Website: True Yoga
5. Book/CD/Movie: None


0. Humor/Quotes...

You must believe in free will; there is no choice. - Isaac Bashevis Singer (1904-1991)

I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work. - Thomas Edison (1847-1931)

Half the work that is done in this world is to make things appear what they are not. - Elias Root Beadle

The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. - Alvin Toffler

1. Yoga and Buddhism ...by David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri)


Yoga and Buddhism are sister traditions which evolved in the same spiritual culture of ancient India. They use many of the same terms and follow many of the same principles and practices. For this reason it is not surprising that many of us born in the West, particularly after an initial exposure, are apt to regard Yoga and Buddhism as more or less the same. The differences that have existed between the two systems historically are less obvious to us than their commonalities. Those who study Buddhism may find so much similarity in Yoga that they will see a strong Buddhist influence on Yoga. Those who study Yoga may find so much similarity in Buddhism that they will see a strong yogic influence on Buddhism.

However the tendency to find commonality between these two great spiritual traditions is not limited to the West. Swami Vivekananda, the first great figure to bring Yoga to the West, examined the Buddhist Mahayana scriptures (Sutras) and found much similarity between their key teachings and those of Vedanta. In recent years with the influx of Tibetan refugees, including the Dalai Lama, into India since the Chinese occupation of Tibet there has been a new dialogue between the two traditions that is bringing about greater respect between them. Tibetan Buddhists often appear at Hindu religious gatherings and partake in all manner of discussions.

Nor is the attempt to connect the two traditions limited to modern times. Various synthetic Hindu-Buddhist teachings have existed through history. Buddha himself was born a Hindu and some scholars have argued that Buddhism as a religion apart from Hinduism did not arise until long after the Buddha had passed away. A Shiva-Buddha teaching existed in Indonesia in medieval times, and for many Tantric Yogis it is difficult to tell whether they were Hindus or Buddhists. Buddha became accepted as an avatar of Vishnu during the period while Buddhism was still flourishing in India, and most Hindus still consider that we live in the age of the Buddha-avatar. Most Hindus accept Buddha, even if they do not accept all Buddhist teachings.

However such synthetic trends did not exclude disagreements and debates between the two traditions, which were quite common historically. Nor did they ever succeed in fully uniting them. Their traditions and lineages remain separate to the present day. Generally the Hindu Yoga tradition sought to absorb Buddhism into itself by reinterpreting Buddha in a more Hindu light. Buddhism however strove to maintain its separate identity. Most Hindu and Buddhist teachers, including those of the Yoga school of Hinduism, found it necessary to discriminate their doctrines, particularly on subtle levels of practice and insight. Hence while we can honor the connections between these two systems, we cannot overlook their differences either.

The Yoga Tradition

By Yoga here we mean primarily the classical Yoga system as set forth by Patanjali in the Yoga Sutras. Patanjali taught an eightfold (ashtanga) system of Yoga emphasizing an integral spiritual development including ethical disciplines (Yama and Niyama), postures (Asana), breathing exercises (Pranayama), control of the senses (Pratyahara), concentration (Dharana), meditation (Dhyana) and absorption (Samadhi). This constitutes a complete and integral system of spiritual training.

However classical Yoga was part of the greater Hindu and Vedic tradition. Patanjali was not the inventor of Yoga, as many people in the West are inclined to believe, but only a compiler of the teaching at a later period. Yogic teachings covering all aspects of Patanjali Yoga are common in pre-Patanjali literature of the Puranas, Mahabharata and Upanishads, where the name Patanjali has yet to occur. The originator of the Yoga system is said to be Hiranyagarbha, who symbolizes the creative and evolutionary force in the universe, and is a form of the Vedic Sun God.

Yoga can be traced back to the Rig Veda itself, the oldest Hindu text which speaks about yoking our mind and insight to the Sun of Truth. Great teachers of early Yoga include the names of many famous Vedic sages like Vasishta, Yajnavalkya, and Jaigishavya. The greatest of the Yogis is always said to be Lord Krishna himself, whose Bhagavad Gita itself is called a Yoga Shastra or authoritative work on Yoga. Among Hindu deities it is Shiva who is the greatest of the Yogis or lord of Yoga, Yogeshvara. Hence a comparison of classical Yoga and Buddhism brings the greater issue of a comparison between Buddhist and Hindu teachings generally.

Unfortunately some misinformed people in the West have claimed that Yoga is not Hindu but is an independent or more universal tradition. They point out that the term Hindu does not appear in the Yoga Sutras, nor does the Yoga Sutra deal with the basic practices of Hinduism. Such readings are superficial. The Yoga Sutras abounds with technical terms of Hindu and Vedic philosophy, which its traditional commentaries and related literature explain in great detail. Another great early Yogic text, the Brihatyogi Yajnavalkya Smriti, describes Vedic mantras and practices along with Yogic practices of asana and pranayama. The same is true of the Yoga Upanishads. Those who try to study Yoga Sutras in isolation are bound to make mistakes. The Yoga Sutras, after all, is a Sutra work. Sutras are short statements, often incomplete sentences, that without any commentary often do not make sense or can be taken in a number of ways.

Other people in the West including several Yoga teachers state that Yoga is not a religion. This can also be misleading. Yoga is not part of any religious dogma proclaiming that there is only one God, church or savior, nor have the great Yoga teachers from India insisted that their students become Hindus, but Yoga is still a system from the Hindu religion. It clearly does deal with the nature of the soul, God and immortality, which are the main topics of religion throughout the world. Its main concern is religious and certainly not merely exercise or health.

Classical Yoga is one of the six schools of Vedic philosophy (sad darsanas) which accept the authority of the Vedas. Yoga is coupled with another of these six schools, the Samkhya system, which sets forth the cosmic principles (tattvas) that the Yogi seeks to realized. Nyaya and Vaisheshika, Purva Mimamsa and Uttara Mimamsa (also called Vedanta) are the remaining schools, set off in groups of two. Yoga is also closely aligned with Vedanta. Most of the great teachers who brought Yoga to the modern world, like Swami Vivekananda, Paramahansa Yogananda, Sri Aurobindo, and Swami Shivananda, were Vedantins.

These six Vedic systems were generally studied together. All adapted to some degree the methods and practices of Yoga. While we can find philosophical arguments and disputes between them, they all aim at unfolding the truth of the Vedas and differ mainly in details or levels of approach. All quote from Vedic texts, including the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and Puranas for deriving their authority.

Some Western scholars call these "the six schools of Indian philosophy." This is a mistake. These schools only represent Vedic systems, not the non-Vedic of which they are several. In addition they only represent Vedic based philosophies of the classical era. There were many other Vedic and Hindu philosophical systems of later times.


The Buddhist schools, of which there are four in classical Indian philosophy, though they shared many ideas and with Vedic spirituality, like karma and rebirth, did not accept the authority of the Vedas and rejected a number of key Vedic principles. All Buddhist schools employ meditation but some add more specific yogic practices, like Pranayama and Mantra. Such systems may be called Buddhist Yoga by modern writers. However, Yoga as a term in lacking in early Buddhist texts, particularly of the Theravadin type, and becomes prominent mainly in the Buddhist Tantric tradition that developed later, particularly as practiced in Tibet. Some Buddhists regard that Buddha was a great Yogi, particularly relative to the occult and psychic powers he was supposed to possess.

Forms of Buddhism

Buddhism has basically two varieties, as well as many subvarieties. The northern, Mahayana or "great vehicle" tradition prevails in Tibet, China and Japan and adjacent countries. This is the type of Buddhism that is most known and followed by the largest number of people in the world. It includes Chan, Zen, Buddhist Tantra, Vajrayana, and Dzog Chen. The southern, Theravadin, prevails in the south of Asia, Sri Lanka, Burma and Thailand. Vipassana is the most commonly known practice of Theravada Buddhism. Generally the Theravadin form is considered to be the older of the two forms of Buddhism. However, most Indian Buddhism, including the Sanskrit Buddhist Sutras, is of the Mahayana branch and has probably been best preserved in Tibet, where it has undergone a further development into Vajrayana.

There are some disagreements between these two main Buddhist lines. The Mahayana tradition calls the Theravadin tradition, the Hinayana, or "lesser vehicle." Many Theravadins consider that types of Mahayana Buddhism, particularly the Tibetan, are not truly Buddhist because they have mixed Buddhism with indigenous religious practices.

The Mahayana tradition, particularly in its Tantric forms, uses breathing exercises, mantras, visualizations and deities much like the Yoga tradition. The Theravadin tradition has less in common with Yoga, though it does use similar meditation and concentration methods. It generally rejects devotional worship and the use of deities such as occurs in Yogic paths. For example, Vipassana teachers have often criticized the use of mantra, which is common not only in Hindu Yogic traditions but in the Mahayana Buddhist teachings. In fact it could be argued that Tibetan Buddhism, with its mantras, deities and yogic teachings, is closer to Hinduism in its teachings than to such Buddhist schools.

Buddhism grew up in a cultural base of Hinduism. For this reason Indian and Tibetan Buddhism have included Ayurvedic medicine, Hindu astrology, Sanskrit, the same rules of iconography and the same forms of temple worship, and other common factors. A number of Hindu Gods and Goddesses, like Ganesh and Sarasvati, appear in the Buddhist tradition. Some figures like the Goddess Tara appear in both. Yet as Buddhism moved to other countries many of these connections were either lost or their basis forgotten.

Nepal has remained as one region of the Indian subcontinent in which both these religions have continued, though Nepal has a Hindu majority, a Hindu king and is officially a Hindu state. In this regard Nepalese Hindus and Buddhist respect one another but seldom combine the teachings of these two different religions by way of their actual practices. They tend to follow one tradition or the other but seldom both.

Yoga and Meditation

Today Yoga is most known for its asana tradition or yogic postures, which are the most popular, visible and outward form of the system. Buddhism is known as a tradition of meditation, as in the more popular forms of Buddhist meditation like Zen and Vipassana. This is rather strange because Yoga traditionally defines itself as meditation, or calming the disturbances of the mind, not as asana, which is taught merely as an aid to meditation. In the Yoga Sutras, the classical text on Yoga, of which there are two hundred Sutras only three deal with asana, while the great majority deal with meditation, its theory and results. In the West we hear people talk of "Yoga and meditation," yoga meaning asana or some other outer practice like pranayama. If one states this in India, one hears "Yoga and meditation, are they two?"

Unfortunately many people who have studied Yoga in the West have learned only the asana or posture side of the teaching, not the meditation side. Some of them may therefore look to Buddhist teachings, like Zen or Vipassana, for meditation practices, not realizing that there are yogic and Vedantic forms of meditation which are traditionally not only part of the yogic system, but its core teaching! The cause for this often resides with Yoga teachers who have not studied the meditation side of their own tradition. Some have not been taught it as purely asana-oriented teachers have become more popular, no doubt owing to their appeal to the physically oriented Western mind.

There is nothing necessarily wrong with doing Yogic asanas and Buddhist meditation but one who is claiming to be a Yoga teacher and yet does not know the Yogic meditation tradition cannot claim to be a real Yoga teacher. We could compare them with someone who practices a Buddhist physical exercise system, like Buddhist martial arts, but on top of this does a non-Buddhist meditation system, and still claims to be a teacher of Buddhism! The real Yoga tradition has aimed at producing meditation masters, not merely beautifully flexible bodies. Mostof the Yoga System of Patanjali is concerned with the science of meditation (sanyama) as concentration, meditation and Samadhi (Dharana, Dhyana, Samadhi). In fact in the beginning of the Yoga Sutras Yoga is defined as Samadhi or spiritual absorption.

Yoga and its related Vedantic systems includes numerous types of meditation both with form and without. These include pranayama techniques like So'ham Pranayama or the various types of Kriya Yoga (like those taught by Yogananda), meditation on deities of all types and various devotional approaches, every sort of mantra from simple bija mantras like Om to long extended mantras like Gayatri, the use of yantras and other geometrical devises, diverse concentration methods, passive meditation approaches and active approaches like the Self-inquiry taught by Ramana Maharshi. It is a rich meditation tradition of which the rich asana tradition is merely an aspect.

Philosophical Differences Between Hinduism and Buddhism

Various Hindu-Buddhist philosophical debates have occurred through time. There are Buddhist refutations of the different schools of Hindu philosophy, including Yoga and Vedanta, and a rejection of Hindu deities like Shiva and Krishna. There are similar Yoga-Vedantic refutations of the different schools of Buddhist philosophy, including the rejection of the omniscience of Buddha, criticism of the Buddhist view of the mind, and so on.

Buddhist scriptures both Mahayana and Theravadin contain refutations of the Atman, Brahman, Ishvara, and the key tenets of Yoga and Vedanta, which are regarded as false doctrines. Note the Lankavatara Sutra, which is very typical in this regard. Refutation of Buddhist teachings does not occur in Hindu scriptures, which are largely pre-Buddhist but are common in the later literature. Many Vedantic, Sankhya and Yoga texts contain refutations of Buddhist doctrines, particularly of the four classical schools of Buddhist philosophy, which are similarly regarded as untrue. Such criticism of Buddhist teachings occur in the Yoga Sutra itself and are common in Advaita or non-dualistic Vedanta.

Such critiques can be found among the works of the greatest Hindu and Buddhist sages like Shankara of the Hindus, and Nagarjuna and Aryadeva of the Buddhists. Relative to Yoga and Buddhism one of the most interesting interactions was between Ishvara Krishna (not Krishna of the Bhagavad Gita) and the Buddhist guru of Vasubandhu, the founder of the Vijnanavada school. The debate was won by Ishvara Krishna and the record of his arguments, the Sankhya Karika was produced, which has become the main text on Samkhya. Vijnanavada, also called Yogachara, is the closest Buddhist school to classical Yoga, but curiously was the Buddhist system most in conflict with it in philosophical debates.

There have been similar, but more limited debates within each tradition, with Advaita Vedanta critiques of other Hindu traditions like Sankhya-Yoga, or Buddhist Madhyamika critiques of Buddhist Vijnanavada and other Buddhist traditions. The Indian tradition cherished debate as a means of finding truth and did not simply aim at superficial intellectual agreements. This tradition of free and open debate is alive not only in India but in Tibet. The Indian tradition never required intellectual uniformity but honored diversity.

How Yoga and Buddhism Compare

Yoga and Buddhism are both meditation traditions devised to help us transcend karma and rebirth and realize the truth of consciousness. They see the suffering and impermanence inherent in all birth, whether it is animal, human or god, and seek to alleviate it through developing a higher awareness. Both emphasize the need to dissolve the ego, the sense of the me and the mine, and return to the original reality that is not limited by the separate self. Both traditions emphasize enlightenment or inner illumination to be realized through meditation.

Both systems recognize dharma, the principle of truth or natural law, as the basic law of the universe we must come to understand. Such dharmas are the law of karma and the unity of all sentient beings. Buddhism defines itself as Buddha dharma or the dharma of the enlightened ones, which is seen as a tradition transcending time or place 2E Yoga defines itself as part of the Hindu tradition called Sanatana Dharma, the universal or eternal dharma, which is not defined according to any particular teacher or tradition. Both traditions have called themselves Arya Dharma or the Dharma of noble men.

The main differences between the two systems are over their cosmic view and way of practice. Vedic systems are built upon fundamental principles like the Self (Atman), the Creator (Ishvara), and Godhead (Brahman). Buddhism rejects all such ontological principles as mere creations of the mind itself. In this regard Vedic systems are more idealistic and Buddhism systems more phenomenological.

Apart from such philosophical differences both systems share the same basic ethical values like non-violence, truthfulness, non-attachment and non-stealing. The vows that Buddhist monks take and those that monks and sadhus take in the Yoga tradition are the same, so are those of Jain monks.

Cosmic Principles

The Absolute

Vedanta defines the absolute as a metaphysical principle Being-Consciousness-Bliss, or Brahman in which there is perfect peace and liberation. Buddhism does recognize an Absolute, which is non-dual and beyond all birth and death. However Buddhism generally does not allow it any definition and regards it as void. It is sometimes called the Dharmakaya or body of dharma, though Sanskrit Buddhist texts never call it Brahman.

Self and not-Self

Buddhism generally rejects the Self (Atma or Purusha) of Yoga-Vedanta and emphasizes the non-Self (anatman). It says that there is no Self in anything and therefore that the Self is merely a fiction of the mind. Whatever we point out as the Self, the Buddhists state, is merely some impression, thought or feeling, but no such homogenous entity like a Self can be found anywhere. Buddhism has tended to lump the Self of Vedanta as another form of the ego or the misconception that there is a Self.

The Yoga-Vedanta tradition emphasizes Self-realization or the realization of our true nature. It states that the Self does not exist in anything external. If we cannot find a self in anything it is no wonder, because if we did find a self in something it would not be the self but that particular thing. We cannot point out anything as the Self because the Self is the one who points all things out. The Self transcends the mind-body complex, but this is not to say that it does not exist. Without the Self we would not exist. We would not even be able to ask questions.

Yoga-Vedanta discriminates between the Self (Atman), which is our true nature as consciousness, and the ego (generally called Ahamkara), which is the false identification of our true nature with the mind-body complex. The Atman of Vedanta is not the ego but is the enlightened awareness which transcends time and space.

However a number of Buddhist traditions, particularly traditions outside of India, like the Chan and Zen traditions of China, have used terms like Self-mind, one's original nature, the original nature of consciousness or one's original face, which are similar to the Self of Vedanta.

Mind and Self

Buddhism defines reality in terms of mind and often refers to ultimate truth as the One Mind or original nature of the mind. In Yoga mind (manas) is regarded as an instrument of consciousness which is the Self. It speaks of the One Self and the many minds which are its vehicles. For it mind is not an ultimate principle but an aspect of creation.

If we examine the terms mind and Self in the two traditions it appears that what Yoga criticizes as attachment to the mind and ego is much like the Buddhist criticism of the attachment to the self, while what Vedanta calls the Supreme Self is similar to the Buddhist idea of the original nature of the Mind or One Mind. The Self is the unborn, uncreate reality similar to what Buddhism refers to as the transcendent aspect of Mind. The enlightened mind which dwells within the heart of the Buddhists (Bodhicitta) resembles the Supreme Self (Paramatman) which also dwells within the heart. Yet these similarities aside, the formulations and methodologies of the two systems in this regard can be quite different. Classical Indian Buddhist texts do not make such correlations either, but insist that the Vedantic Self is different than the One Mind of Buddhism.

God or the Creator

The yogic tradition is based upon a recognition of, respect for and devotion to God or the creator, preserver and destroyer of the universe. One of its main principles is that of surrender to God (Ishvara-Pranidhana), which is said to be the most direct method to Self-realization. Some degree of theism exists in the various Yoga-Vedanta teachings, though in Advatic systems Ishvara is subordinated to the Self-Absolute, which transcend even the Creator. This is perhaps the main point of difference between Yoga and Buddhism. Buddhism rejects God (Ishvara) or a cosmic lord and creator. It sees no need for any creator and considers that living beings arise through karma alone. The Dalai Lama recently noted that Buddha is similar to God in omniscience but is not a creator of the universe.

Yet we do note that some modern Buddhist teachers use the term God and make it equivalent to the Buddha-nature. There is also the figure of the Adi-Buddha or primordial Buddha in some Buddhist traditions who resembles God. The Buddha appears as God not in the sense of a theological entity but as the Divine potential inherent in living beings, but is similarly looked upon as a great being who is prayed to for forgiveness of misdeeds 2E

Karma and Rebirth

Both systems see karma as the main causative factor behind rebirth in the world. However in Buddhism karma is said to be a self-existent principle. Buddhism states that the world exists owing to the beginningless karma of living beings. In the Yoga tradition, however, karma is not a self-existent principle. The world is created by God (Ishvara), the creative aspect of consciousness. Karma as a mere force of inertia and attachment cannot explain the creation of the world but only our attachment to it. Karma is regarded as a force dispensed by God, which cannot exist by itself, just as a law code cannot exist without a judge. However some other Vedic systems, also, like Purva Mimamsa put more emphasis upon karma than upon God.

Yoga recognizes the existence of a Jiva or individual soul who is reborn. Buddhism denies the existence of such a soul and says that rebirth is just the continuance of a stream of karma, not any real entity.

The Figure of the Buddha

All Buddhist traditions go back to the Buddha and most emphasize studying the life of the historical Buddha, Shakyamuni. The Vedic tradition, on the other hand, recognizes many teachers and there is no one teacher that everyone must follow or look back to. There is no single historical figure like the Buddha that dominates the tradition or whom all must follow, honor or worship. Hinduism has accepted Buddha as a great teacher but it has included him among its stream of many other teachers, gurus and avatars. Buddhism does recognize the existence of Buddhas both before and after the historical Buddha, and says that a Buddha comes into the world every 5000 years. It is interesting to note that the previous Buddha to the historical Buddha is called Kashyapa which is also the name of one of the oldest and most important of the Vedic seers. However Buddhism has yet to include any of the great yogis and Rishis of Hinduism as on par with the Buddha as enlightened sages.

The term Buddha itself is common in Vedic teachings, as it is a common Sanskrit term meaning wise, awake, aware or enlightened. When Buddhism is referred to in Hindu literature it is called Bauddha Dharma or Saugata Dharma, as there is nothing in the term Buddha in Sanskrit that refers to a particular person or religion. While Hindus make Buddha into an avatar, in Buddhism Buddha cannot be an avatar because Buddhism has no God that Buddha could manifest. If Buddha is an avatar in Buddhism it is of the enlightened mind, not of the Creator.


Both systems regard Nirvana or mergence in the Absolute as a primary goal of practice. However in the Buddhist tradition, particularly the Theravadin, Nirvana is generally described only negatively as cessation. It is given no positive appellations. In the Vedic tradition Nirvana is described in a positive way as mergence into Brahman or Sacchidananda, Being-Consciousness-Bliss, the realization of the infinite and eternal Self, called Brahma Nirvana. Yet both systems agree that this truth transcends all concepts. Vedanta describes Nirvana as freedom or liberation (Moksha). This term does not occur in Buddhism which does not accept the existence of any soul that can be liberated.

Devotion and Compassion

Yoga with its recognition of God emphasizes devotion and surrender to God (Ishvara-pranidhana) as one of the main spiritual paths. It contains an entire Yogic approach based on devotion, Bhakti Yoga, through which we open our hearts to God and surrender to the Divine Will. As Buddhism does not recognize God, devotion to God does not appear as a Buddhist path. That is why we don't find any significant tradition of great devotees and singers of Divine Love in Buddhism like Chaitanya, Ramakrishna, Tulsidas or Mirabai in the Hindu tradition.

Buddhism does recognize devotion to the Buddha or faith in the Buddha-mind. However devotion to great teachers or to functions of the enlightened mind does not quite strike the human heart with the same significance as devotion to the Divine Father and Mother of the Universe, the creator, preserver and destroyer of all, which requires a recognition of God.

Not having God to guide and protect living beings, Buddhism has developed the role of the Bodhisattva, the enlightened one who stays on after enlightenment to teach and guide living beings. As according to Yoga God and all the sages merged in him are ever present to help all beings, so there is no need for such a special Bodhisattva vow. Yoga values compassion as an ethical principle, however, and says that we cannot realize our true Self as long as we think that we are separate from other creatures.

Gods and Goddesses/ Buddhas and Bodhisattvas

Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, technically speaking, are not deities or Gods and Goddesses. They are not forms of the Divine Father and Mother and have no role in creating, preserving and destroying the universe. They are not the parents of all creatures but merely wise guides and teachers. They are often described as great beings who once lived and attained enlightenment at some point in time and took various vows to stay in the world to help save living beings.

For example perhaps the greatest Buddhist Goddess, Tara is such a Bodhisattva, anenlightened person - not the Divine Mother like Durga or Kali of Hinduism - but a great enlightened sage who has continued to exist in the world to help living beings. She is not the Goddess or a form of God but a personal expression of the enlightened mind and its power of compassion. There are also meditation Buddhas (Dhyani Buddhas), who represent archetypes of enlightenment.

Yet though the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas are not forms of God, they can be prayed toto provide grace and protection. For example, the Bodhisattva Tara was thought to save those in calamities. Worship of various Bodhisattvas is called Deity Yoga in the Tibetan tradition.


If we can equate the One Mind of the Buddhists with the One Self of Vedanta, make Buddha and God the same and give the Buddha the power of creation of the universe, and make other such correlations, both traditions could be synthesized. However this would essentially absorb Buddhism into Hinduism and make the Buddhist rejection of the Vedas unnecessary. This is what most Hindus incline do with Buddhism. However prominent Buddhist leaders have yet to make such statements. Until they do we cannot dismiss such differences as unnecessary but must respect them as a different view of truth or different approach to it. If you believe not only in karma and rebirth but also the existence of God or the Creator, you would be a Hindu, not a Buddhist in your views.

Choosing a Path

There are a number of people in the West today, and even in India, who are combining Yoga and Buddhism, as well as less related traditions. Some people may try to follow gurus in both traditions (generally without the approval of the teachers). Of course, teachings which are common to both traditions like non-violence are obviously easy to correlate. Different meditation techniques, however, may not be so easy to combine. For example it may be difficult to meditate upon the Supreme Self of Vedanta, while meditating upon the non-Self of Buddhism. The Buddhist approach requires doubting that there is any self at all. The Vedantic approach requires complete faith in the Self and merging everything into it. Above all it is hard to maintain certain devotional approaches in a Buddhist context where there is no real God or Creator.

In this eclectic age such synthetic experimentation is bound to continue and may prove fruitful in some instances, particularly when one is still searching out one's path. Yet it frequently gets people lost or confused, trying to mix teachings together they do not really understand. Jumping back and forth between teachers and traditions may prevent us from getting anywhere with any of them. Superficial synthesis, which is largely a mental exercise, is no substitute for deep practice that requires dedicated concentration. The goal is not to combine the paths but to reach to the goal, which requires taking a true path out to the end. While there maybe many paths up to the top of a mountain, one will not climb far cross-crossing between paths. Above all it is not for students on the path to try to combine paths. It is for the masters, the great lineage bearers in the traditions, to do so, if this is necessary.

Today we are entering into a global age that requires the development of a global spirituality. This requires honoring all forms of the inner quest regardless of where and when they come from. The unity of truth cuts across all boundaries and breaks down all divisions between human beings. It is crucial that such meditation traditions as Yoga and Buddhism form a common front in light of the needs of the global era. All such true spiritual traditions face many common enemies in this materialistic age. Their common values of protecting the earth, non-violence, recognition of the law of karma, and the practice of meditation are perhaps the crucial voice to deliver us out of our present crisis.

But in coming together the diversity of teachings should be preserved, which means not only recognizing their unity but respecting their differences. This is the same issue as that of different cultures. While we should recognize the unity of humanity, we should allow various cultures to preserve their unique forms, and not simply throw them all into one big melting pot, in which all their distinctions are lost. True unity is universality that fosters a creative multiplicity, not a uniformity that reduces everything to a stereotype. Truth is not only One but Infinite and cannot be reduced to any final forms. Pluralism is also true as each individual is unique and we should have a broad enough view to allow others to have contrary opinions. As the Vedic Rishis stated, "That which is the One Truth the seers teach in diverse ways." This is to accommodate all the different types and levels of souls.

PO Box 8357, Santa Fe NM, 87504-8357
David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri), Director

2. Hindu Yoga, Buddhist Yoga, Jaina Yoga ...by Georg Feuerstein


In an article entitled “Yoga and Buddhism,” published on the Web site of Hinduism Today, David Frawley (Vamadeva Shastri) speaks of Yoga and Buddhism as sister traditions. It would perhaps be more appropriate to characterize Hinduism as a sister tradition to Buddhism and Jainism. However, these three are not merely particular spiritual traditions spawned on Indian soil but whole cultures with their own distinct moral and spiritual teachings, art, architecture, and social organization. There are many overlaps but also significant divergencies. For instance, in the area of social organization, Buddhism does not subscribe to the caste system, which is a hall mark of Hinduism (though by no means all Hindu traditions accept or support it).

Yoga is commonly understood to be an aspect of Hinduism. However, both the term and the concept (in the sense of spiritual practice) are also widespread in Buddhism. Thus it makes little sense to compare Yoga and Buddhism, unless we define Yoga more narrowly as the particular philosophical system known as yoga-darshana, as expounded in Patanjali’s Yoga-Sûtra and its extensive commentarial literature.

In the broadest sense, Yoga is simply spiritual practice, or spirituality. It is India’s version of what has long been known as “mysticism” in Christianity, “Kabbalah” in Judaism, and “Sufism” in Islam. Hinduism and Buddhism, as well as Jainism, are all yogic cultures or traditions. That is to say, these cultures are at heart spiritual: They acknowledge and promote the age-old ideal of liberation (moksha), however it may be conceived. Yoga has from the beginning been a liberation teaching (moksha-shâstra), and as such has shaped Hinduism, Buddhism, and also Jainism.

“Hinduism” is the name given to a particular developmental phase of the complex civilization that originated in India over eight millennia ago and that has meantime spread throughout the world. Buddhism is not, as widely thought, an offshoot of Hinduism but of the Indic civilization as such. Yoga is a unique contribution to humankind by the Indic civilization.

Many Western Yoga students confuse Yoga with Hinduism and typically pitch it against Buddhism. Many more Westerners confuse Yoga with physical exercise (i.e., the yogic postures) and see in Buddhism a path of meditation. But the oppositions "Yoga : Hinduism" and "Yoga : Buddhist meditation" are ill conceived.

Yoga is common to both cultural traditions and forms their spiritual essence. Yoga must not be reduced to a mere system of physical exercises but clearly offers many spiritual methods and approaches, especially meditation. It makes no sense to say, as often heard, that Yoga has no meditation practice and that therefore one must resort to Buddhist meditation. Yoga has a wide variety of meditation techniques, which include Buddhist, Hindu, and Jaina meditation practices.

During the past two and half millennia or so, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jaina have been in dialoguewith each other, and each cultural tradition has incorporated elements from the others. It has even been said that the disappearance of Buddhism from India was largely due to the fact that Shankara and his school of Advaita Vedanta, or nondual metaphysics, so successfully assimilated Buddhist ideas that Buddhism lost its foothold with regard to the dominant Hindu culture. The Moslem invasion of Northern India was, however, a more decisive factor.

There has traditionally been far less tension between Hinduism and Jainism, since most Jaina adherents regard themselves as Hindu or as not being in conflict with Hinduism. At times, the dialogue between Hindu and Buddhist Yoga was indeed doctrinaire and fierce, but when we look at the great teachers and teachings we also find much common ground. Those of us in the West who are not mired in religious ideology and have imbibed a cosmopolitan outlook, the doctrinal squabbles among the Indic traditions are of little relevance. We are hungering for practices that can nourish us spiritually and in our pragmatist approach are willing to regard their theoretical underpinnings with openmindedness.

Since the mid-1960s, I have endeavored to make Hindu Yoga accessible to my fellow-Westerners. I have focused on such key scriptures as the Yoga-Sûtra and the Bhagavad-Gîtâ, but also have translated or commented on other, in the West less well-known Yoga texts. I brought many of them together in my book The Yoga Tradition, and in that volume also furnished a broad overview of the history of Hindu, Buddhist, and Jaina Yoga.

In my scholarly work thus far, I have had less concern with Buddhist Yoga, which, from the beginning of my career, I felt had received better attention by preceding scholars than had Hindu Yoga. Certainly over the past two decades, there has been an increasing preoccupation with Buddhist Yoga in the form of Tibetan Buddhism. What is more, the custodians of the Tibetan Buddhist heritage have shown a great willingness to impart to Westerners the esoteric practices underlying their sacred texts. In the case of Hindu Yoga, this is no longer possible to the same extent, though there still are masters capable of imparting the full range of practices and expounding the teachings of specific schools, such as Shrî Vidyâ, Kaula, Nâtha, Kashmiri Shaivism, or Gaudîya.

Compared to Hindu and Buddhist Yoga, Jaina Yoga is a sealed book for Westerner spiritual seekers, who may not even have heard of it. Yet it has its own distinct path and practices, which are kept alive by a few adepts and which definitely deserve to be better known. However, the scriptures of the Jainas have been neglected by scholars, and only a few texts are available in English translation.

Jaina Saint Shri Vidya Sagar

From the vantage point of our own time, we can look upon the incredibly complex and diversified heritage of Yoga and appreciate its unique significance for the human race. The adepts of Yoga have blazed trails to summits that at present we see only through a glass darkly but that we sense are of utter relevance to our human destiny. As we delve into the yogic heritage, we encounter a breathtaking wealth of ideas and practices. Yet, at the bottom of it all, are a handful of universal truths that, once we have recognized them, can become powerful agents of transformation for us. Equipped with that recognition, we can then engage any form of Yoga or any specific practice with efficiency and tolerance. © 2000 by Georg Feuerstein

3. An Introduction to the Practice of Yoga and Buddhism ...By John C. Kimbrough


In wanting to apply and benefit from a spiritual path and practice, it is necessary to be knowledgeable about and understand the path and the various mental and physical disciplines and practices that make it up. The first thing to learn and understand is what is the basic philosophy behind that path and its practices. The second thing to learn and understand is what the path and its practice actually consist of. The third thing is to learn and understand is what we achieve from the implementation of this path and practice. The fourth thing is to learn and understand is what are those things that may stand in the way of us making progress and succeeding in our implementation of this path and practice. 

We can look at both Yoga and Buddhism in these terms and surprisingly for some, we will see those four things to be the same or strikingly similar. Both are based on the philosophy that there is suffering in life and it is caused by mental defilements and the state of our ego. Both put forth a path of mental and physical practices in order to weaken and alleviate these tendencies of mind and ego which create individual pain and pain in our actions with others. This path of mental and physical practices revolves around moral and ethical actions to ourselves and others and meditation. 

The postures of Yoga that most individuals perceive Yoga to be and consist of are used to prepare the mind and body to be more open to, understanding of and strong and disciplined enough to practice the teachings in their entirety. The implementation of these paths brings about a change in one’s consciousness so states of consciousness that are already part of our being are accessed, strengthened and cultivated. These are states such as tranquility, concentration and mindfulness, among others. Both Yoga and Buddhism refer to states of mental and physical being that creates hindrances to growth, progress and success in the spiritual path and practice. These include things such as doubt, sensual desire, restlessness, and worry, among others. So if one wants to learn about either Yoga or Buddhism, just out of a general interest or with the idea to bring them into their life so that there will be some meaningful and joyful change to their being, one may want to learn and study them from this perspective. 

We do not have to go to India or Thailand in order to learn these things. Books and teachers are usually available in our own countries and information can be easily accessed and downloaded through the services of the internet and the various websites that are devoted to these teachings. Because someone is from Thailand, India or Sri Lanka does not make them more knowledgeable about or more advanced in the teachings and practices of either Yoga or Buddhism. We may need or benefit from what might be termed hands on assistance, so a weekend retreat or a retreat or stay in a temple or ashram that is longer may be beneficial. In this environment we can get some support in cultivating our understanding and practice and have others to answer our questions and direct us in a skillful way as we are sharing this experience with like-minded people and teachers who have more experience in this and are skilled and knowledgeable in sharing the teachings and practices that make them up with us. Also retreats and longer stays in temples or ashrams offer a physical and logistical environment that can create a new mindfulness of how we can practice skillfully and effectively at home on our own. Then it is really up to us to try to implement these things into our lives. 

We may approach this in various ways and have various results from it. We may push ourselves quite hard and want quick expectations. This may lead to burnout and disappointment, and one may give up quickly. Another way that we approach it may be in an inconsistent manner, practicing and studying here and there, when possible, when we can and we are reminded as to how to practice. Another way will be in a disciplined way, learning, studying and practicing on a regular basis and building on what we learn, what we realize and awaken to and on our meditation practice. Some may experience all of these approaches and it may take months or even years until they have developed a strong and consistent practice. 

One’s individual nature may be a factor in how they cultivate this strong and consistent practice, as will what kind of habits and behaviors they have to deal with and overcome and changes that they may have to make in their life and free and leisure time in order to practice on a regular basis. Sometimes it is not cultivating the practice of meditation or posture practice that is most demanding and challenging for a person to bring into their lives as it is to bring into their lives those teachings that one might call moral and ethical teachings and practices. Sadly, in Yoga these teachings are frequently overlooked or only touched on briefly. In Buddhism, they make up a major part of the teachings and should be studied with an attempt made to understood and implement them from the very first day of one’s exposure to the teachings of Buddhism. 

Just being exposed to these teachings is one thing. Understanding and being able to implement them into all of our daily activities and actions can be incredibly difficult. It may take daily study and reflection on the teachings, in addition to whatever one’s physical practice consists of, that being meditation and posture practice. But to define these as being physical practices is in itself an error as these practices where one is working with the body and breath in a manner where the body is still in a meditative posture for an extended period of time, or as one performs a variety of postures that bend and twist the spine in various ways, one is also working on the consciousness in subtle and overt ways. For many, this is the starting point of one’s practice and many of us know how much of a challenge and effort this can be. Through this sort of discipline, we do become more mindful and concentrated, and that in itself opens us up more to understanding the wisdom and simplicity of the teachings and makes it more possible for us to successfully implement them. 

The books below are highly recommended for those who want to learn more about the paths and practices of Buddhism and Yoga. 

Nath, Pandit Shambhu. Speaking of Yoga: A Practical Guide to Better Living. New Delhi, India: Sterling Publishers 1991

Brandjes, Sophia. On the Gentle Path of Yoga in Sickness and in Health. Thornleigh, N.S.W. :Gerard and Sophia Brandjes 1993

Hewitt, James. Teach Yourself Yoga. London, England: The English Universities Press 1960 

The Sivinanda Yoga Center. The Book of Yoga: The Complete Step - by- Step Guide. London, England: Ebury Press 1983

Iyengar, B.K.S. Light on Yoga. New Delhi, India: Harper Collins Publishers India 1992

Chidananda, Swami. The Philosophy, Psychology and Practice of Yoga. Tehri - Garhwal, U.P. India: The Divine Life Society. 1991

Iyengar, B.K.S. Light on The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali. New Delhi, India: Harper Collins Publishers India. 1993

Prabhavananda, Swami. Patanjali Yoga Sutras. Mylapore, Madras. Sri Ramakrishna Math. Copyright date unknown

Taimni, I.K. The Science of Yoga Adyar. Madras, India: The Theosophical Publishing House. 1961

Hariharananda Aranya, Swami. Yoga Philosophy of Patanjali. Calcutta: University of Calcutta. 1981

Pandita, Sayadaw U. In This Very Life:The Liberation Teachings of the Buddha. Kandy, Sri Lanka:The Buddhist Publication Society 1991 

Nyanaponika, Thera. The Heart of Buddhist Meditation. Kandy, Sri Lanka:The Buddhist Publication Society 1962

Bodhi, Bhikkhu. The Noble Eightfold Path:Way to the End of Suffering. Kandy, Sri Lanka:The Buddhist Publication Society 1984 (free download at UrbanDharma.org - see eBooks page)

Radhakhrishnan, S. The Bhagavad Gita. New Delhi, India: HarperCollins 1993 

Vivikenanda, Swami Raja. Yoga. Calcutta, India :Advaita Ashram 1998 

Muktibodhananda, Swami. Hatha Yoga. Pradipka Mungar, Bihar, India Bihar School of Yoga: 1985 

Piyadassi, Thera. The Buddhas Ancient Path. Kandy, Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society 1964

*2003 John C. Kimbrough (John lives and teaches in Bangkok, Thailand.

4. True Yoga


2873 East Thousand Oaks Blvd.
Thousand Oaks, CA. 91362

Retail Store Hours:

Monday 9:45AM - 7:00PM
Tuesday 10:15AM - 5:45PM
Wednesday 9:45AM - 7:00PM
Thursday 10:15AM - 5:45PM
Friday 9:45AM - 6:00PM
Saturday 10:15AM - 4:30PM
Sunday Open for class time only.

WELCOME TO TRUE YOGA . . . Yoga is an ancient tradition that enables us to create a lifestyle which promotes health and happiness. Literally meaning unity, yoga utilizes the power of breath to strengthen the body and calm the mind. A yoga practice encourages an internal focus so that we become aware of the natural flow of energy that resides in our body. This natural energy is unlocked through yoga asanas (poses) and maintains the vitality which keeps us youthful and well spirited. At True Yoga, classes are in Hatha yoga, the physical form of yoga. True Yoga offers the invaluable exploration of the body, mind, and spirit which will bring renewed energy and serenity to each individual that embraces it.


Easter Sunday - True Yoga will be closed.

FREE INTRODUCTORY CLASS, THE FIRST SUNDAY OF EVERY MONTH . . . 2:00-3:30. Open to all students interested in our studio and an excellent way to learn the fundamentals as well as ask your questions.

Kids Yoga with Shanthi. 5 classes, A great learning experience for kids ages 7 - 12.

Monday to Friday April 12 - 16.

The Ayurvedic Solution with Arun Deva. Learn to apply the principles of this ancient yet tangible practice in order to create a healthier lifestyle. Sun. April 18, 1:00 - 4:00.

Creating a Home Practice with Jessica Anderson. Learn the necessities to establishing a well-rounded home practice when you are away from the studio.

Saturday, April 24th, 12:00 2:00.


The Urban Dharma Newsletter Archives:



The Los Angeles Buddhist-Catholic Dialogue:



Support "Dana" UrbanDharma.org: